NICUlearn
← Evidence

Evidence · Randomised trial

Meropenem vs standard of care for treatment of neonatal late onset sepsis (NeoMero1): A randomised controlled trial.

Randomised trialPLoS One2020Over 5 years oldFull text
  • Infection
  • Late-onset sepsis
  • Medical

This paper is from 2020, more than five years ago. Newer evidence may have been published since.

Summary

NeoMero-1 was a multicentre, open-label phase III randomised superiority trial across 18 neonatal units in six countries comparing meropenem with standard-of-care regimens (ampicillin plus gentamicin or cefotaxime plus gentamicin) for empirical treatment of neonatal late onset sepsis. It enrolled infants with culture-confirmed or clinically suspected sepsis, assessing treatment success at test-of-cure, safety, mortality and acquisition of carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative organisms. The trial was underpowered and found no evidence that meropenem was superior overall, though outcomes favoured meropenem in culture-positive infants. The authors suggest reserving meropenem for neonates more likely to have Gram-negative sepsis, particularly where ESBL- and AmpC-producing organisms circulate.

Summary written for NICUlearn. Always read the original.

Read the original paper
Licence:
Open (Creative Commons)

The full text of this openly licensed paper is available to NICUlearn members, and Neeky can answer questions from it.

Guidelines are shown for education. Follow your unit's own guidance and senior advice.

ShareWhatsAppLinkedInX