NICUlearn
← Evidence

Evidence · Systematic review or meta-analysis

Cost-effectiveness of strategies to improve the utilization and provision of maternal and newborn health care in low-income and lower-middle-income countries: a systematic review.

Systematic review or meta-analysisBMC Pregnancy and Childbirth2014Over 5 years oldFull text
  • Breast milk and breastfeeding
  • Families and professional practice
  • Medical
  • Nursing
  • Postnatal and transitional care
  • Quality improvement

This paper is from 2014, more than five years ago. Newer evidence may have been published since.

Summary

This systematic review examines the cost-effectiveness of behavioural and health systems strategies to improve the utilisation and provision of maternal and newborn care in low-income and lower-middle-income countries. It included 48 publications reporting 43 studies, assessed using the CHEERS statement, and compared incremental costs per life-year saved or DALY averted with GDP per capita. Reasonably strong evidence supported women's groups, home-based newborn care by community health workers and traditional birth attendants, enhanced antenatal care, facility-based quality improvement, and breastfeeding promotion in maternity hospitals. The evidence base was limited by few high-quality studies and disparate outcome measures.

Summary written for NICUlearn. Always read the original.

Read the original paper
Licence:
Open (Creative Commons)

The full text of this openly licensed paper is available to NICUlearn members, and Neeky can answer questions from it.

Guidelines are shown for education. Follow your unit's own guidance and senior advice.

ShareWhatsAppLinkedInX