NICUlearn
← Evidence

Evidence · Systematic review or meta-analysis

Comparing Malposition and Complications Associated with Ultrasound-Guided versus Radiography-Guided Central Catheter Tip-Position in Neonates: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Systematic review or meta-analysisNeonatology2025Full text
  • Comfort and nursing care
  • Families and professional practice
  • Line and device care
  • Medical
  • Nursing

Summary

This systematic review and meta-analysis compares ultrasound-guided with radiography-guided confirmation of central catheter tip position in neonates, including eight studies (four RCTs and four non-randomised studies, 1,322 infants). Outcomes included malposition, number of X-rays, procedure time, catheter manipulation, tamponade, extravasation, occlusion and sepsis. Ultrasound guidance was associated with fewer malpositions and less radiation exposure, with no clear differences in procedure time, manipulation or sepsis. All evidence was rated low certainty, and further research is recommended.

Summary written for NICUlearn. Always read the original.

Read the original paper
Licence:
Open (Creative Commons)

The full text of this openly licensed paper is available to NICUlearn members, and Neeky can answer questions from it.

Guidelines are shown for education. Follow your unit's own guidance and senior advice.

ShareWhatsAppLinkedInX