NICUlearn
← Evidence

Evidence · Systematic review or meta-analysis

Weaning strategies for the withdrawal of non-invasive respiratory support applying continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Systematic review or meta-analysisBMJ Paediatrics Open2020Over 5 years oldFull text
  • Bronchopulmonary dysplasia
  • CPAP and high flow
  • Medical
  • Nursing
  • Respiratory

This paper is from 2020, more than five years ago. Newer evidence may have been published since.

Summary

Systematic review and meta-analysis of 15 randomised trials (1,547 infants) comparing strategies for weaning preterm infants born before 37 weeks from non-invasive respiratory support with nasal CPAP or high-flow nasal cannula. It compares gradual pressure weaning, sudden discontinuation, stepdown to nasal cannula and interval training. Gradual pressure weaning may improve first-attempt success, stepdown to nasal cannula allowed earlier weaning but longer oxygen supplementation, and interval training showed no benefit. No strategy affected chronic lung disease or length of hospital stay.

Summary written for NICUlearn. Always read the original.

Read the original paper
Licence:
Open (Creative Commons)

The full text of this openly licensed paper is available to NICUlearn members, and Neeky can answer questions from it.

Guidelines are shown for education. Follow your unit's own guidance and senior advice.

ShareWhatsAppLinkedInX